All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2021-08-18T08:15:38.000Z

Severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients receiving HSCT

Aug 18, 2021
Share:

Bookmark this article

The coronavirus pandemic has put a great strain on worldwide healthcare systems. Patients with hematologic malignancies have been at greater risk than the general population of experiencing severe COVID-19 and are more likely to succumb to this infection.

One of the major tools in the arsenal of weapons against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are vaccines. The speed at which vaccines have been produced to combat the COVID-19 pandemic has been impressive; however, little investigation has been carried out to assess the effectiveness of these vaccines in patients with a compromised immune response such as those who have received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In addition, whether the vaccines can trigger or exacerbate graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in patients who had undergone HSCT is unclear and required investigation.

Two recent studies have assessed the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection,1 and the safety of vaccination,2 in patients who have undergone cellular therapy.

Mushtaq, et al. studied the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on patients who had undergone HSCT or been treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, and assessed the clinical characteristics that were associated with poor outcomes (active GvHD, therapy, HSCT type).1

Ali, et al. assessed the safety of two of the emergency-use authorized vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 in patients who had undergone HSCT.2

Study by Mushtaq, et al. on the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection1

Study design

To assess the severity of SARS-CoV-2 in patients, a single center prospective study that included 58 adult patients with COVID-19 who had received HSCT/CAR T-cell therapy was carried out. The baseline characteristics of the patients involved are shown in Table 1. The study also estimated the number of patients who were at risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 after HSCT/CAR T-cell therapy, which was 756 between January 2019 and May 2021. The timeframe for including patients was calculated from the median time from HSCT/CAR T-cell therapy to infection, which was 17.7 months.

Only 5% of patients were treated with CAR T-cell therapy, 55% were given an allogeneic (allo) transplant and the remaining 40% received an autologous (auto) transplant (p = 0.027). Most patients underwent myeloablative conditioning (62%) and in 45% of patients the donor type was listed as self (p = 0.054). Out of all patients included, nine died from COVID-19. Factors that increased the chance of severe COVID-19 and death included: patients with myeloid disorders (p = 0.042), allo-HSCT recipients (p = 0.027), and those with a history of acute GvHD (p = 0.017).

Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics*

Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated)

Total
(N = 58)

COVID-19 severity

Mild
(n = 29)

Mod-severe
(n = 20)

Fatal
(n = 9)

Median age (range), years

58
(24–77)

58
(24–75)

57
(24–77)

62
(25–73)

Male

64

69

60

56

Ethnicity

Caucasian

69

72

65

67

Hispanic

16

10

15

33

African American

12

17

5.5

0

Others

3

0

10.5

0

Time of COVID-19 diagnosis

Mar 2020–Sep 2020

22

28

20

11

Oct 2020–May 2021

78

72

80

89

Hematologic malignancy

Plasma cell disorders

36

48

35

0

Lymphoid disorders

26

21

35

22

Myeloid disorders

38

31

30

78

Types of cellular therapy

Allo-HCT

55

38

60

100

Auto-HCT

40

55

35

0

CAR T-cell

5

7

5

0

Donor type

Self

45

62

40

0

Matched sibling

15

10

15

33

Matched unrelated

21

14

20

45

Haploidentical

19

14

25

22

Conditioning

Myeloablative

62

62

70

44

Reduced intensity and non-myeloablative

38

38

30

33

GvHD prophylaxis

Tacrolimus/ methotrexate

36

24

35

78

Post-transplantation CTM

19

14

25

22

None

45

62

40

0

HCT CI

0–1

38

44

25

45

2–3

33

28

45

22

>3

29

28

30

33

Prior aGvHD Grade II–IV

22

10

25

56

Prior cGvHD requiring systemic steroids

26

17

25

56

aGvHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; allo, allogeneic; auto, autologous; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; cGvHD, chronic graft-versus-host disease; CI, comorbidity index; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CTM, cyclophosphamide and tacrolismus and mycophenolate; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation.
*Data from Mushtaq, et al.1

Results

The clinical characteristics of the 58 patients with COVID-19 infection were assessed and the characteristics that were associated with increased severity of disease and death included:

  • active GvHD (p = 0.033)
  • being on immunosuppressive therapy (p < 0.001)
  • current immunotherapy (p = 0.019)
  • lymphopenia (p = 0.049)
  • high serum ferritin level (p = 0.02)
  • high neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.040)
  • high platelet: lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.008)

The number of patients estimated to be at increased risk of COVID-19 infection was 756, with an incidence of 8% out of the total cohort. Patients receiving allo-HSCT alone were more likely to get COVID-19 with an incidence of 11% compared with auto-HSCT and CAR T-cell recipients for whom the incidence was 6% and 3%, respectively. In addition, allo-HSCT patients were more likely to develop severe COVID-19 compared with CAR T-cell or auto-HSCT recipients (34% vs 17%; p = 0.013).

The severity of COVID-19 infection, treatment, and outcomes for patients receiving HSCT or CAR T-cell therapy are shown in Table 2. COVID-19 infection was fatal in 16% of patients surveyed and severe in a further 12%. All patients who experienced fatal SARS-CoV-2 infection had received allo-HCT. In the allo-HCT cohort, 16% required mechanical ventilation and 28% were admitted to an intensive care unit. In the auto-HCT group these numbers were reduced, with only 4% requiring ventilation and 9% intensive care unit admission. In the allo-HCT group, 72% recovered from infection compared with the auto-HCT group which showed 100% recovery.

Table 2. Disease severity, treatments, and outcomes in at risk patients*

Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated)

Total

Type of cellular therapy

Allo-HCT

Auto-HCT

CAR-T

Number at risk

756

286

373

97

Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection

8

11

6

3

Median age (range), years

58 
(24–77)

56 (24–73)

65 (24–77)

60 (51–75)

Median time since HSCT/ CAR-T (range), months

17.7
(0.2–201.9)

17.3
(1–201.9)

23.9
(0.2–118.7)

2.6
(2.3–4.8)

COVID-19 diagnosis in first 100 days post-HCT/CAR-T

22

25

13

67

COVID-19 severity

Mild

50

34

70

67

Moderate

22

31

13

0

Severe

12

6

17

33

Critical/ fatal

16

28

0

0

Abnormal chest imagining

50

67

30

33

Hypoxia

28

34

17

33

ICU admission

19

28

9

0

Mechanical ventilation

10

16

4

0

COVID-19 therapy

Remdesivir

41

63

13

33

Convalescent plasma

35

50

13

33

Dexamethasone

22

31

9

33

Monoclonal antibodies

19

25

9

33

Tocilizumab

3

6

0

0

Median time to clear SARS-CoV-2 infection (range), weeks

7.7
(2.0–18.7)

7.6
(2.0–18.7)

7.8
(2.6–16.9)

NA

Median follow-up after COVID-19 (range), months

6.1
(0.5–13.6)

5.5
(0.5–12.4)

6.4
(3.4–13.6)

5.7
(4.4–8.9)

Outcomes

Recovered

81

72

100

33

 

Persistent

3

0

0

67

 

Dead

16

28

0

0

Allo, allogeneic; auto, autologous; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; ICU, intensive care unit; NA, not applicable; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2.
*Data from Mushtaq, et al.1

Vaccine study by Ali, et al.2

A retrospective study of 113 adult patients who had received HSCT and been given at least one dose of either the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine was undertaken. The study also investigated the incidence of new onset GvHD or worsening of any existing GvHD symptoms.

The patient characteristics for this study are given in Table 3. Patients included had a median age of 66.5 years and 69% were male. The primary diagnosis was acute myeloid leukemia in 45.1%, with myelodysplastic syndromes and myelofibrosis the second and third most prevalent diagnoses, respectively. At the time of vaccine administration 66% of patients were receiving immunosuppressive therapy for GvHD prevention or treatment. Out of the patients included, four had history of a positive COVID-19 PCR test before vaccination. Of these patients two subsequently tested negative before vaccination but the results of the other two patients are unknown.

Table 3. Baseline patient characteristics*

Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated)

Total (N = 113)

Median age at vaccination (range), years

66.5 (22–77)

Median time after transplant at vaccination (range), days

588 (100–11,004)

Vaccine received

BNT162b2

43.4

 

mRNA-1273

56.6

Female

31.0

Primary diagnosis at HSCT

AML

45.1

 

ALL

8.0

 

MDS

17.7

 

Myelofibrosis

15.9

 

Other

13.3

Donor type

Matched related

23.0

 

Matched unrelated

46.9

 

Mismatch unrelated

13.3

 

Haploidentical

16.8

Immunosuppressant for GvHD

Yes

65.5

 

No

34.5

Corticosteroid use for GvHD

13.3

Prior positive COVID-19 test

3.5

Completed patient survey to assess tolerability

31.9

Median time to survey response after first dose (range), days

35 (2–108)

ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome.
*Data from Ali, et al.2

Patient-reported adverse effects (AEs) were recorded for 40 days following the final dose of vaccination. The AEs experienced by patients are recorded in Table 4, but no details on severity of AEs were given. In total, 36 (31.9%) patients responded to the survey to assess AEs after vaccination. This was made up to 52 and 48 patients being evaluable after the first and second dose, respectively, with physician documentation of patient-reported AEs.

Table 4. Adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination*

Adverse effect, %

First dose (N = 113)

Second dose (N = 105)

Evaluable patients

46.0

45.7

Fever

2.0

4.2

Chills

3.8

4.2

Fatigue

15.4

29.2

Myalgias/arthralgias

7.7

14.6

Injection site pain

40.4

43.8

Other symptoms

15.4

16.7

*Data from Ali, et al.2
Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, and injection-site rash and swelling.

The most common AE experienced after the first dose was injection site pain (40.4%) followed by fatigue (15.4%) and myalgias/arthralgias (7.7%). Following the second dose of vaccination the rates of AEs reported increased in almost all categories with injection site pain being recorded in 43.8%, fatigue in 29.2%, and myalgia/ arthralgia in 14.6%.

The laboratory results showed the most common AE to be hepatic impairment (18.6%), with the majority of patients only experiencing Grade 1 severity. Neutropenia (13.3%), thrombocytopenia (11.5%), lymphopenia (8.8%), and eosinophilia (4.4%) were also recorded (Table 5).

Table 5. Clinical laboratory adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination*

Adverse effect

Incidence

Hepatic impairment, %

18.6

Median time to evaluation of hepatic impairment (range), days

26 (3–66)

Neutropenia, %

13.3

Median time to evaluation of neutropenia (range), days

20.5 (3–49)

Thrombocytopenia, %

11.5

Median time to evaluation of thrombocytopenia (range), days

34 (6–66)

Lymphopenia, %

8.8

Median time to evaluation of lymphopenia (range), days

19.5 (10–55)

Eosinophilia, %

4.4

Median time to evaluation of eosinophilia (range), days

28 (13–58)

*Adapted from Ali, et al.2

The effect of vaccination on GvHD incidence and severity was also investigated. In the patients included in this study the baseline level of chronic GvHD was 39.8%, predominantly involving the skin (68.9%) or with an oral focus (37.8%).

New cases of chronic GvHD occurred in 9.7% whereas existing GvHD symptoms deteriorated in 3.5% and two patients experienced both new and worsening symptoms of GvHD. These patients are now all well controlled with improving or resolved symptoms after a later follow-up.

Conclusion

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 can be severe in patients receiving stem cell transplants especially for allo-HSCT recipients with a fatality rate of almost 30% in this group. In addition, severity of COVID-19 was linked to history of Grade 2–4 aGvHD and immunosuppression therapy. In terms of vaccination, both vaccines examined in patients undergoing HSCT appear to be well tolerated with no new safety signals being recorded following at least one dose of the vaccination. There was an incidence of 9.7% of new cases of chronic GvHD and a low rate of worsening chronic GvHD symptoms (3.5%), though causality to the vaccines could not be established given the retrospective nature of the study. While the efficacy of these vaccines remains unclear in this patient population, given the increased risk of severe or fatal COVID-19 in allo-HSCT recipients, vaccination is a good option for this group despite any potential activation of inflammatory pathways and immune-related adverse events. Vaccination in patients receiving allo-HSCT is supported by recommendations from the American Society of Hematology, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.2

  1. Mushtaq MU, Shahzad M, Chaudhary SG, et al. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy recipients. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021. Online ahead of print. DOI: 1016/j.jtct.2021.07.005
  2. Ali H, Ngo D, Aribi A, et al. Safety and tolerability of SARS-CoV-2 emergency-use authorized vaccines allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Transplant Cell Ther. Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.07.008

More about...

Your opinion matters

Do you intend to implement next generation sequencing for measurable residual disease monitoring in AML patients?
0 votes - 5 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox