All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Bookmark this article
During the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the AML Hub spoke to Christoph Röllig, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, DE. We asked, Can we omit a second induction cycle in patients with good early response?
SAL-Daunodouble trial: Can we omit a second induction cycle in patients with good early response?
Röllig talks about the results from the interim analysis of the randomized controlled SAL-Daunodouble trial, designed to understand if patients with newly diagnosed AML with a good early response to first induction could be spared a second induction cycle.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox