The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View aml content recommended for you
Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have adverse biology status and a higher prevalence of co-morbidities, which prevents these patients from receiving intensive chemotherapy.1 The current mainstay treatment for patients with AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy consists of hypomethylating agents and low-dose cytarabine.2
Dr. Govind Kanakasetty, from Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India, and colleagues, conducted this single-center, retrospective analysis aimed to assess overall survival (OS) in elderly patients (median age = 68 years; range, 61–84) with newly diagnosed, immunophenotypically confirmed de novo or secondary AML. Secondary outcomes included response rates, survival across groups and safety assessments.
Patients received one of the following treatment regimens: a hypomethylating agent (HMA; n = 58), either azacitidine (100 mg/m2/day, for 7 days every 28 days) or decitabine (20 mg/m2, for 5 days every 28 days); low-dose cytarabine (LDAC; n = 81; 20 mg/day, bi-daily, every 28 days); or best supportive care (BSC; n = 49) with or without hydroxyurea, with transfusion of blood products, and treatment of infections.
All data are shown as HMA group versus LDAC group versus BSC group, where applicable
In conclusion, this real-world experience shows that HMAs are more effective than LDAC in the treatment of elderly patients with AML. Furthermore, the authors concluded that achieving a response to therapy or attaining transfusion independence improves survival. However, due to the single-center retrospective nature of this analysis, these findings need to be further validated in prospective multicenter trials. The authors of this study also commented on the additional challenges present in developing countries, including access to healthcare and funding, highlighting the need for cost-effective newer therapies for elderly patients with AML.
References