All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Syndax, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kura Oncology, and AbbVie. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View AML content recommended for you
Results from a single-center retrospective study, evaluating the prognostic impact of ASXL1 mutations in adults with newly diagnosed (ND) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with venetoclax (Ven)-based lower-intensity therapy (LIT), were published in Cancer by Marvin-Peek et al. The analysis included 554 adults treated with LIT + Ven (ASXL1-mutated [ASXL1m], n = 73; ASXL1 wild-type [ASXL1wt], n = 481), including 239 patients classified as favorable risk per European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2024 classification. Outcomes were assessed by ASXL1 status and treatment backbone.
Key data: Among ELN 2024 favorable-risk patients, ASXL1m vs ASXL1wt was associated with lower composite complete remission (CRc) rates (69% vs 90%; p < 0.001), shorter median overall survival (OS; 16.2 vs 35.4 months; p = 0.003), and numerically shorter median relapse-free survival (RFS; 14.9 vs 26.2 months; p = 0.09), resembling ELN 2024 intermediate-risk disease. On multivariable analysis, ASXL1m remained independently associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06–2.55; p = 0.03), with similar inverse probability-weighted results (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.13–2.57; p = 0.01). The impact was most pronounced with cladribine (Clad) + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) + Ven (n = 95), where the CRc rate was 58% in patients with ASXL1m AML vs 93% in those with ASXL1wt AML (p = 0.02), and median OS was 17 months vs not reached, respectively (p = 0.024). Meanwhile, among patients receiving hypomethylating agent (HMA) + Ven-based therapy, ASXL1m vs ASXL1wt AML showed a nonsignificant trend toward lower CRc rates and shorter median OS.
Key learning: ELN 2024 favorable-risk ASXL1m AML treated with Ven-based LIT may be more appropriately classified as intermediate-risk, supporting integration of ASXL1 status and treatment backbone choice into first-line risk assessment and treatment planning.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
Which AML-related topic do you currently need the most practical guidance on?