All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

  TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, and Syndax, and has been supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Phase Ib study of pevonedistat plus azacitidine in older AML patients

By Cynthia Umukoro

Share:

Jan 24, 2018


Addition of the first-in-class NEDD8-Activating Enzyme (NAE) inhibitor, pevonedistat (PEV), to azacitidine (AZA) was well tolerated in treatment-naïve Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients who are 60 years and over and unfit for intensive chemotherapy, according to results from a phase Ib study (NCT01814826) published in Blood on 18 January 2018, by Ronan T. Swords from the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, and colleagues.

PEV works by disrupting cullin-RING ligase-mediated protein turnover leading to apoptotic death in human tumor cells via the deregulation of S-phase DNA synthesis. In preclinical studies, PEV enhances the anti-leukemic effects of AZA in AML cell lines. In this phase Ib dose-escalation study, Sword et al. aimed to investigate the safety and tolerability of PEV plus AZA in treatment-naïve older AML patients. The primary endpoints of the study were to determine the Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) and the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of PEV in combination with AZA.

In total, 64 AML patients with a median age of 75 years (range, 61 – 89 years) were enrolled in this study. Patients were administered intravenous (IV) PEV at either 20 mg/m2 (n = 6) or 30 mg/m2 (n = 3) on days 1, 3 and 5 plus a fixed dose of AZA (75 mg/m2 IV or subcutaneously) on days 1 – 5, 8 and 9, every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients in the expansion cohort (n = 55) were treated at the MTD.            

Key findings:

  • Safety in all Intention-to-Treat (ITT) patients (n = 64)

    • Median number of cycles of treatment with PEV plus AZA: 4 cycles (range, 1–37)
    • DLT of persistent grade 2 bilirubin elevation and reversible grade 4 AST elevation occurred in two patients respectively receiving PEV at 30 mg/m2
    • MTD of PEV in combination with AZA: 20 mg/m2
    • Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events include constipation (48%), nausea (42%), fatigue (42%) and anemia (39%)
    • Death occurred in 11 patients due to disease progression or disease-related events but deemed unrelated to study therapy
  • Efficacy

    • Overall Response Rate (ORR) in ITT patients = 50%
      • Median remission duration = 8.3 months
      • 91% of patients achieved responses within the first 2– 4 cycles of treatment
    • Median overall survivals of patients treated at the MTD = 7.0 months

In summary, PEV in combination with AZA led to response rates and durable remissions with limited additional toxicity beyond what is expected for AZA alone.  The authors concluded by noting that, the “timing and frequency of responses suggest potential benefit for the addition of PEV to standard regimen of single-agent AZA”.

References

More about...

Your opinion matters

What barriers do you encounter when conducting multiple MRD tests during treatment?