TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Long-term survival patterns in AML across age groups in Nordic countries

By Haimanti Mandal

Share:

Jul 8, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in AML.



Hemminki, et al. published an article in Blood Cancer Journal on age-specific survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) across a 50-year time period (19722021), using data from the NORDCAN database, sourced from the cancer registries of Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. 


Key learnings

1-, 5/1-, and 5-year relative survival in patients with AML improved in all age groups (0–49 years, 50–59 years, 60–69 years, and 70–79 years), apart from the 8089 years group. 

Among the Nordic countries, survival rates were highest in Sweden, with 5-year relative survival rates of 80% in the 049 years, 70% in the 50–59 years, 45% in the 60–69 years, and 20% in the 70–79 years group. 

  • Survival improvements in Sweden and Denmark were attributed to more intensive therapy, novel agents, wider use of transplant, better supportive care, and overall public health. 

The age-related survival gap widened over time; when comparing the 1972–1976 and 20172021 periods, the 5-year relative survival in the 049 years group improved from <10% to 60–80%. This improvement decreased successively in each older age-group (50% in the 50–59 years, 30–40% in the 60–69 years, and 19% in the 70–79 years group) to as low as 0–5% in 80–89 year olds. 

In the 70–79 years age group, 1-year survival increased from 10% to >40%; 5-year survival also improved for this age group, particularly in Sweden, likely due to the introduction of treatment guidelines in 2005 recommending initial intensive therapy with cytarabine and anthracycline. 

However, patients aged over 80 years, in whom survival has not improved much over the past 50 years, may benefit from upfront treatment with venetoclax plus hypomethylating agent combination therapy, although survival studies with population-level verification are needed. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Approximately what proportion of your patients with FLT3-mutations also have NPM1 and DNMT3A co-mutations?