TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Long-term survival outcomes in patients with AML who were alive and disease-free 2 years after allo-HSCT

By Dylan Barrett

Share:

Nov 14, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute myeloid leukemia.



Although most deaths following allo-HSCT occur in the first 2 years post transplantation, long-term survivors are still at risk of late complications.1 A large, multicenter, retrospective, EBMT registry-based study assessed long-term survival and prognostic factors of late relapse in adult patients with acute leukemia who were alive and disease-free at 2 years after allo-HSCT. This analysis included 9,027 patients with AML who underwent allo-HSCT between 2005 and 2012. Results were published in Hemasphere by Larue et al.1


Key learnings
The 10-year probability for OS and LFS was 76.2% and 72.3%, respectively.
The cumulative RI and NRM at 10 years was 15.6% and 12.1%, respectively, and the probability of cGRFS at 10 years was 68.1%.
Patient- and disease-specific factors: Older age and adverse cytogenetic profiles were associated with worse survival outcomes.
Transplant-specific factors: PB grafts vs BM grafts, and female donor to male recipient transplantation were associated with inferior survival outcomes. The use of RIC vs MAC was associated with higher OS, LFS, and NRM, and the use of ATG was associated with higher OS and LFS, and lower NRM and cGvHD.
Relapses (42.7%) and cGvHD (17.0%) were the most common cause of late mortality.
These findings underscore the importance of optimizing pre-transplant strategies and the need for targeted interventions and surveillance strategies in long-term survivorship care to reduce late complications and improve survival outcomes.

Abbreviations: allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; BM, bone marrow; cGRFS, composite of chronic graft‐versus‐host disease‐free and relapse‐free survival; cGvHD, chronic graft-versus-host disease; EBMT, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation; LFS, leukemia-free survival; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; NRM, non-relapse mortality; OS, overall survival; PB, peripheral blood; RI, relapse incidence; UD, unrelated donor. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

More about...