All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology, Roche, Syndax and Thermo Fisher, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

2023-12-01T10:34:22.000Z

Impact of fungal infections on transplant outcomes: A CIBMTR analysis

Dec 1, 2023
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to describe the latest data relating to infection prophylaxis regimens and their impact on clinical practice.

Bookmark this article

Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is associated with improved GvHD-free and relapse-free survival. An association between PTCy and viral infections, including cytomegalovirus, non-cytomegalovirus herpes viruses, and community respiratory viruses, has been reported in Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry studies. However, details relating to certainty of diagnosis, invasive vs superficial infection, treatment information, and antifungal prophylaxis were not captured by these studies.

Recently, Papanicolaou, et al.1 published a CIBMTR cohort study in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy examining the association of haploidentical donor source and/or PTCy with fungal infections. Here, we summarize the key findings.

Study design

This was a CIBMTR registry cohort study comprising 11,964 patients aged ≥2 years undergoing their first hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) between 2012 and 2017. The three cohorts included:

  • haplo donor (≥2 antigen/allele mismatch) with PTCy (HaploCy cohort)
  • human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling donor with PTCy (SibCy cohort)
  • sibling donor with calcineurin inhibitor-based GvHD prophylaxis (SibCNI cohort)

Outcomes of interest included association of donor source and/or PTCy with fungal infection, impact of fungal infection on overall survival, transplant-related mortality (TRM), relapse, and chronic GvHD 2-years post HSCT.

Baseline characteristics

Table 1 shows selected baseline characteristics across the three cohorts.

Table 1. Selected baseline characteristics*

Characteristics, % (unless otherwise stated)

HaploCy cohort
(n = 757)

SibCy cohort
(n = 403)

SibCNI cohort
(n = 1,605)

p value

Median age (range), years

58 (3–78)

46 (3–75)

57 (2–78)

<0.001

Median donor age (range), years

36 (9–76)

45 (4–72)

54 (2–82)

<0.001

Karnofsky/Lansky performance status <80

16

16

12

<0.001

Race/ethnicity

<0.001

              Caucasian, non-Hispanic

59

59

69

 

              Caucasian, Hispanic

10

11

8

 

              African-American, non-              Hispanic

17

14

7

 

              Asian, non-Hispanic

7

7

6

 

Positive CMV status

72

68

67

0.04

Disease status

<0.001

              AML/ALL, early

41

47

45

 

              AML/ALL, intermediate

19

19

13

 

              AML/ALL, advanced

13

15

9

 

              MDS, early

10

6

11

 

              MDS, advanced

17

12

21

 

Peripheral blood stem cell grafts

59

67

88

<0.001

Myeloablative conditioning

41

55

58

<0.001

TBI

<0.001

              No

30

42

73

 

              Yes and >800 cGy

15

20

16

 

Growth factor

82

79

24

<0.001

GvHD prophylaxis

<0.001

              Cyclophosphamide

100

100

0

 

              Tac/CsA + MMF ± others

0

0

23

 

              Tac/CsA + MTX ± others

0

0

77

 

Median time from diagnosis (range), months

7 (1–165)

7 (<1–396)

5 (1–556)

<0.001

Year of HSCT

<0.001

              2012–2014

22

22

50

 

              2015–2017

78

78

50

 

ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CsA, cyclosporin; GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MTX, methotrexate; TBI, total body irradiation.
*Data from Papanicolaou, et al.1
Haplo donor (≥2 antigen/allele mismatch) with PTCy (HaploCy); HLA-identical sibling donor with PTCy (SibCy); Sibling donor with calcineurin inhibitor-based GvHD prophylaxis (SibCNI).
Values are statistically significant.

Key findings

Fungal infections

At least one fungal infection 180 days post-HSCT occurred in 7%, 6%, and 4% of patients in the HaploCy, SibCy, and SibCNI cohort, respectively (p < 0.001). Figure 1 shows the proportion of patients for each type of fungal infection across all three cohorts. Fungal infection density scores for yeast and mold are shown in Table 2.

Figure 1. Fungal infection across all cohorts* 

*Data from Papanicolaou, et al.1
A patient may have had >1 fungal infection.

 Table 2. Fungal infection density score*

Fungal infection density score

HaploCy cohort

SibCy cohort

SibCNI cohort

p value

Yeast

0.063

0.028

0.022

<0.001

Mold

0.036

0.047

0.019

0.009

*Data from Papanicolaou, et al.1
Values are statistically significant.

The cumulative incidence of yeast infection was higher in HaploCy cohort compared with SibCy and SibCNI cohort (p < 0.001; Figure 2). The incidence of mold fungal infection was higher in the PTCy cohort vs SibCNI cohort (p = 0.040). This statistical significance was lost when assessing the incidence based on time to neutrophil engraftment and onset of acute GvHD (aGvHD).

Figure 2. Cumulative incidence of fungal infection*

CI, cumulative incidence.
*Data from Papanicolaou, et al.1

Fungal infections and transplant outcomes

Overall survival

Death due to fungal infection occurred in 1.6%, 0.7%, and 0.8% of patients in the HaploCy, SibCy, and SibCNI cohort, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that presence of fungal infection was associated with increased mortality in the HaploCY and SibCy cohort vs the SibCNI cohort (p < 0.0001). Other factors associated with increased mortality included age >60 years, advanced acute leukemia, high- or very high-risk MDS, aGvHD, and lack of neutrophil engraftment prior to fungal infection (p < 0.0001 each).

TRM

Fungal infections were associated with an increased risk of TRM in both PTCy cohorts compared with SibCNI cohort. Overall, aGvHD, lack of neutrophil engraftment, and high- or very high-risk MDS also contributed to increased risk of TRM (p < 0.0001 each).

Relapse

HSCT performed >6 months after diagnosis and development of aGvHD were associated with a lower risk of relapse (p < 0.0001 each), while use of non-myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (p = 0.0011) and transplantation for high- or very high-risk MDS (p = 0.0014) or advanced acute leukemia (p = 0.0027) were associated with a higher risk of relapse.

Chronic GvHD

A decreased incidence of chronic GvHD was linked to the use of PTCy in the absence of fungal infections; the adjusted hazard ratio for HaploCy and SibCy cohorts were 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57–1.03) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.56–0.92), respectively.

Figure 3. Association of fungal infections with HSCT outcomes* 

cGvHD, chronic graft-versus-host disease; FI, fungal infection; OS, overall survival; TRM, transplant-related mortality.
*Data from
Papanicolaou, et al.1
Adjusted effect of fungal infection.

Conclusion

This retrospective analysis demonstrated that fungal infection was associated with decreased overall survival and increased TRM at 2 years, irrespective of donor type or use of PTCy. The risk of yeast infection was higher in the HaploCy cohort, and the risk of mold infection was higher in HaploCy and SibCy compared with SibCNI cohort. The authors noted several limitations of this study; including choice of haploidentical graft or PTCy-based prophylaxis, which was made at the discretion of each center; the lack of a standardized definition of fungal infection; and variation in prophylaxis, diagnosis, treatment, and reporting of infections across the three cohorts. Further research focusing on improved strategies for the prevention and treatment of fungal infection posttransplantant is warranted.

  1. Papanicolaou GA, Chen M, He N, et al. Incidence and impact of fungal infections in post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis and haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation: a center for international blood and marrow transplant research analysis. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023;S2666-6367(23)01556-01557. DOI: 1016/j.jtct.2023.09.017

Your opinion matters

HCPs, what is your preferred format for educational content on the AML Hub?
35 votes - 23 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox