The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View aml content recommended for you
Numerous patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), especially older patients, present with pre-existing comorbidities at diagnosis. These concomitant conditions cause additional challenges for treating physicians in terms of polypharmacy interactions, how to confidently assess the risk-benefit ratios of managing each condition, as well as the patient’s AML, and the fact that there is a paucity of treatment guidelines.
Y.Ofran., et al., have provided case studies on common clinical scenarios relating to organ dysfunction. The authors focused on induction and consolidation with some reference to allogeneic transplantation. This practical guide was published in Blood in 2016.
It may be entirely reasonable to offer standard induction therapy with very close cardiac monitoring.
The choice is very individualized and will take into account the patient’s age, performance status and any comorbidities.
In general, patients with cardiomyopathy, if clinically stable, need not preclude therapy for AML.
For this patient, immediate medical therapy should include the combination of aspirin, beta-blockers, allopurinol, hydration, correction of electrolyte imbalances, and maintenance of hemoglobin level of 8 g/dL.
If signs or symptoms of ischemia persist, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be discussed. Intractable ischemia must be resolved prior to initiating induction therapy.
In conclusion, the presence of ACS should not discourage aggressive therapy for AML.
Effective collaboration between the hematologist and nephrologist is required. The most pertinent clinical concern to first resolve is the potential for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).
The best approach to induction and post-remission therapy in a patient with chronic renal failure is unknown.
Cytarabine can still be used with dose adjustments according to the patient’s creatinine clearance.
Overall, renal dysfunction presents a significant barrier to treatment of AML. Scrupulous attention to metabolic abnormalities and chemotherapy dose adjustment are crucial.
Prophylaxis is essential for patients receiving severe immunosuppressive therapy. AML induction and consolidation therapy fall into this category.
The efficacy of such prophylaxis has been demonstrated in several controlled trials. Prophylaxis, induction and consolidation therapy can be given at standard doses and if indicated, allogeneic transplantation can be undertaken.
The presence of antibody to HBsAg may offer some protection, but this is probably insufficient to discard prophylaxis.
Allogeneic transplantation is obviously hazardous and would not be carried out for a patient with uncompensated cirrhosis.
In contrast, for a patient with Child I cirrhosis who is in CR, RIC transplantation could be considered.
Cirrhosis of the liver presents a serious dilemma; dose reduction is often required and curative options are usually precluded if associated with severe hyperbilirubinemia.
AML patients with COPD are usually excluded from clinical trials and presents many complications.
In addition, pulmonary hypertension raises the mortality from sepsis.
Patient treatment should be evaluated in relation to the Sorror comorbidity indices.
Hypomethylating therapy may be an alternative to intensive induction as it may be efficacious for “low proliferative” leukemia as well as in frail patients.
Overall, the absence of unequivocal guidelines means that the approach to therapy requires experience, careful judgment, and subspecialty support.
In a patient with a prior ICH, blood pressure control reduces recurrent central nervous system (CNS) bleeding risk by 50%.
Urgent anti-leukemic therapy with the aim to control the blast count is indicated because hyperleukocytosis is associated with increased bleeding risk.
Patients with ICH can receive optimal induction therapy, provided the platelets are kept at relatively safe levels.
In older patients, in whom the risk of re-bleeding is significantly high and allogeneic transplantation is not a practical option, less myeloablative therapy should be considered.
But how can a treating physician gain the expertise and confidence? Dr Rowe one of the authors made the following statement when this question was posed to him:
Dr Rowe: Through 38 years of hands-on experience, seeing patients year round, working with outstanding colleagues and being inspired by patients who gave us strength where none seemed possible.
In conclusion, the management of these pre-existing comorbidities in AML requires careful consideration and effective collaboration with other specialities in order to facilitate the most appropriate treatment plan for patient’s individual circumstances.
References