All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology, Roche, Syndax and Thermo Fisher, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
How have venetoclax combinations changed the way we treat AML?
Bookmark this article
During the 2020 Annual Meeting of the Society of Hematologic Oncology (SOHO), the AML Hub spoke to Daniel Pollyea, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, US. We asked: How have venetoclax combinations changed the way we treat AML?
How have venetoclax combinations changed the way we treat AML?
He discusses results from the randomized phase III study comparing venetoclax + azacitidine vs azacitidine alone as frontline treatment for elderly or unfit patients with AML. The data highlighted a significant improvement in response rates in patients receiving venetoclax + azacitadine vs azacitidine alone. Daniel Pollyea classifies this regimen as the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.
Venetoclax based regimens are not limited to unfit patients, but are also being explored in other subsets of patients with AML, such as those with poor prognostic risk factors for intensive chemotherapy.
More about...
Your opinion matters
28 votes - 48 days left ...
Related articles
Newsletter
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox