All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Bookmark this article
Translocation between 7p15 and 11p15 [t(7;11)(p15;p15)], is a chromosomal abnormality which results in a fusion of the Nucleoporin (NUP98) gene on 11p15 and the Homeobox A9 (HOXA9) gene on 7p15. The NUP98-HOXA9 fusion gene can contribute to leukemogenesis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and is associated with poor outcomes in patients. There is a paucity of studies that have evaluated the transplant outcomes of AML patients with t(7;11)(p15;p15), hence the rationale for this study.
On 16th November 2017, in a Letter to the Editor of Haematologica, Kaito Harada from Tokai University, Isehara, Japan, and co-authors reported results from their retrospective study which compared the transplant outcomes in AML patients with t(7;11)(p15;p15) versus patients with intermediate- or poor-risk AML variants. The study endpoints were Overall Survival (OS), Disease-free Survival (DFS), Relapse Rate and Transplant-related Mortality (TRM).
Using data from the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program, the authors identified 91 patients with AML harboring t(7;11)(p15;p15) who were enrolled between 1986–2014. They also identified 7,308 and 2,406 patients with intermediate- and poor-risk AML respectively with chromosomal changes other than t(7;11)(p15;p15). The median follow-up period was 1124 days in survivors (n = 4,278).
Overall, Harada et al. concluded that their findings support the use of allo-HSCT in the treatment of patients with t(7;11)(p15;p15) AML, especially in first CR regarding the patients with superior outcomes. Unfortunately, allo-HSCT was found to be less effective in patients with high-risk disease or in second CR. In light of these findings, the authors stated that a larger prospective trial comparing allo-HSCT with standard chemotherapy is needed to confirm these results.
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox