All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, and Syndax, and has been supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View AML content recommended for you
While intensive anthracycline and cytarabine-based chemotherapy have demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), intensive chemotherapy is associated with toxicity and resource utilization, and improved survival outcomes have not been validated in low- and middle-income countries. Deana et al. recently published findings from the randomized phase III GATLA 8-LMA-P’07 trial (NCT06211452) in Argentina, in the Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. The trial investigated whether further intensification of chemotherapy – based on two short consolidation cycles with anthracyclines and cytarabine – reduced the cumulative incidence of relapse vs standard 6-week consolidation, in pediatric patients aged 0 to 18 years with newly diagnosed AML. Following two induction cycles, patients in remission were treated with either a standard consolidation chemotherapy regimen (n = 50) or 2-cycle consolidation with cytarabine + idarubicin + high-dose cytarabine + mitoxantrone (n = 57). The primary outcome was 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse.
|
Key learnings |
There was no significant difference in 5-year CIR between the standard consolidation and 2-cycle consolidation regimens (CIR [SE], 31% [0.1] vs 39% [0.1]; p = 0.25). |
5-year EFS was not significantly different between the standard consolidation and 2-cycle consolidation regimens (53.6% [0.8] vs 44.3 [0.7]; p = 0.31), nor was 5-year overall survival (55.0% [0.8] vs 53.7% [0.7]; p = 0.91). |
TRM occurred in six patients receiving standard consolidation and in two patients receiving 2-cycle consolidation; the most common cause of TRM in both groups was infection. |
The 2-cycle consolidation regimen did not significantly improve outcomes vs standard consolidation in pediatric patients in Argentina with newly diagnosed AML. Future research should explore new strategies, including supportive care, to improve outcomes. |
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CIR, cumulative incidence of relapse; EFS, event-free survival; SE, standard error; TRM, transplant-related mortality.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
When treating a patient newly diagnosed with IDH1-mutated AML who is ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, which initial treatment approach would you most likely consider?