All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Mutation testing in AML:
What you need to know

with Charles Craddock, Ralph Hills, and Gail Roboz

Wednesday, April 23, 2025
17:30-18:30 BST

Register now

This independent educational activity is supported by Thermo Fisher Scientific. All content is developed independently by the faculty. The funder is allowed no influence on the content.

  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb and Servier. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

2024-01-03T13:33:58.000Z

ELPIS: Efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine in patients with AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy

Jan 3, 2024
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new development in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Bookmark this article

The use of high-dose cytarabine in older or ineligible patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with gastrointestinal and cerebellar toxicity. On August 4, 2020, the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted aspacytarabine Fast Track designation for the treatment of AML in older patients, and an early phase I/II trial of aspacytarabine, a novel cytarabine, demonstrated its safety in patients with AML.

Here, we summarize a phase II study published by Altman et al.1 in Blood Advances assessing the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine in patients with AML.

Study design1

  • This was an open-label, multicenter study (NCT03435848) in previously untreated patients with de novo or secondary AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.
  • Treatment included one or two induction cycles followed by ≤3 cycles of consolidation with aspacytarabine monotherapy at 4.5 g/m2/day, administered intravenously for 6 days.
    • Patients who demonstrated measurable residual disease after the second course were allowed a third cycle of consolidation.
  • The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR), compared with age-matched controls from best standard of care at protocol initiation, and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Key findings1

  • The CR rates in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and subgroups are shown in Figure 1
  • Overall, the ITT CR rate was higher compared with an age-matched meta-analysis of historical studies of low-dose cytarabine and hypomethylating agents
  • At a median follow-up of 13.7 months, 65 and 66 patients were assessed for response and safety, respectively
  • In the ITT population (n = 65), overall survival (OS) was 9 months (range, 6–15.9 months)
  • In the responder group, OS was not reached (n = 24); 1-year OS was 79.3%
  • In the non-responder group, OS was 4 months (range, 2–7.9 months)
  • Median relapse-free survival was 8.7 months; 1-year relapse-free survival was 40.6%
  • All patients demonstrated hematologic recovery by Day 26 without prolonged cytopenias.

Figure 1. CR rates in the ITT population and by subgroups* 

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CR, complete remission; HMA, hypomethylating agent; ITT, intent-to-treat.
*Adapted from Altman, et al.1

  • Measurable residual disease negativity was achieved by 18.5% of patients in the ITT population and 50% of responders
  • All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent AE (Figure 2)
    • In total, 55% of patients died; 15% due to treatment-emergent AEs, including sepsis (n = 4) and pulmonary edema (n = 2)

Figure 2. Grade ≥3 TEAEs experienced with aspacytarabine in the ELPIS study* 

TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.
*Adapted from Altman, et al.1

Key findings

  • Patients treated with aspacytarabine achieved a CR rate of 36.9%, including a complete hematologic recovery without prolonged cytopenias.
  • Aspacytarabine also demonstrated a tolerable safety profile following repeated administration.
  • The findings suggest that aspacytarabine has potential as an alternative first-line treatment option for patients with AML.

  1. Altman JK, Zuckerman T, Koprivnikar J, et al. Aspacytarabine for the treatment of patients with AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 2 study. Blood Adv. 2023;7(24):7494-7500. DOI: 1182/bloodadvances.2023010943

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox