TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

ELPIS: Efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine in patients with AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Jan 3, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new development in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.


The use of high-dose cytarabine in older or ineligible patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with gastrointestinal and cerebellar toxicity. On August 4, 2020, the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted aspacytarabine Fast Track designation for the treatment of AML in older patients, and an early phase I/II trial of aspacytarabine, a novel cytarabine, demonstrated its safety in patients with AML.

Here, we summarize a phase II study published by Altman et al.1 in Blood Advances assessing the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine in patients with AML.

Study design1

  • This was an open-label, multicenter study (NCT03435848) in previously untreated patients with de novo or secondary AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.
  • Treatment included one or two induction cycles followed by ≤3 cycles of consolidation with aspacytarabine monotherapy at 4.5 g/m2/day, administered intravenously for 6 days.
    • Patients who demonstrated measurable residual disease after the second course were allowed a third cycle of consolidation.
  • The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR), compared with age-matched controls from best standard of care at protocol initiation, and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Key findings1

  • The CR rates in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and subgroups are shown in Figure 1
  • Overall, the ITT CR rate was higher compared with an age-matched meta-analysis of historical studies of low-dose cytarabine and hypomethylating agents
  • At a median follow-up of 13.7 months, 65 and 66 patients were assessed for response and safety, respectively
  • In the ITT population (n = 65), overall survival (OS) was 9 months (range, 6–15.9 months)
  • In the responder group, OS was not reached (n = 24); 1-year OS was 79.3%
  • In the non-responder group, OS was 4 months (range, 2–7.9 months)
  • Median relapse-free survival was 8.7 months; 1-year relapse-free survival was 40.6%
  • All patients demonstrated hematologic recovery by Day 26 without prolonged cytopenias.

Figure 1. CR rates in the ITT population and by subgroups* 

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CR, complete remission; HMA, hypomethylating agent; ITT, intent-to-treat.
*Adapted from Altman, et al.1

  • Measurable residual disease negativity was achieved by 18.5% of patients in the ITT population and 50% of responders
  • All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent AE (Figure 2)
    • In total, 55% of patients died; 15% due to treatment-emergent AEs, including sepsis (n = 4) and pulmonary edema (n = 2)

Figure 2. Grade ≥3 TEAEs experienced with aspacytarabine in the ELPIS study* 

TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.
*Adapted from Altman, et al.1

Key findings

  • Patients treated with aspacytarabine achieved a CR rate of 36.9%, including a complete hematologic recovery without prolonged cytopenias.
  • Aspacytarabine also demonstrated a tolerable safety profile following repeated administration.
  • The findings suggest that aspacytarabine has potential as an alternative first-line treatment option for patients with AML.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content