All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Roche and Syndax and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
During the 24th Meeting of the European Hematology Association (EHA) in Amsterdam, NL, Gail Roboz, Weill Cornell Medicine and The Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, US, presented an updated analysis from the first-in-human phase I trial of AMV564, a novel bispecific CD33/CD3 targeted immunotherapeutic, which was tested in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Professor (Prof.) Roboz highlighted that relapse is still very common and a prominent problem in AML, with patients who relapse generally succumbing to the disease within 1 year. She noted that chemotherapeutic agents, and hypomethylating agents, are equally unsuccessful with overall response rates (ORRs) ranging between 18% and 41% in selected studies. This, therefore, means that the AML field is looking for novel agents that can counteract the existing dismal outcome. One such area of novel agents gaining a lot of interest is immunotherapy.
AMV564 is a bivalent, bispecific CD33/CD3 T-cell engager;
Characteristic |
|
---|---|
Total (N) |
33 |
Median age (years) |
71.5 (24–85) |
ECOG score ≥2 |
12% |
Secondary AML |
73% |
Prior allo-HSCT |
9% |
Prior intensive chemotherapy |
64% |
MRC cytogenetic risk – unfavorable |
58% |
Enrollment bone marrow (BM) blasts |
30% (3%–96%) |
Baseline white blood cell count (x109/L) |
2.1 (0.2–13.8) |
Target dose level (mcg) |
Number of cycles |
Best response (throughout cycles) |
Response at last assessment |
---|---|---|---|
100 |
5 |
SD |
SD |
100 |
2 |
PR |
PR |
150 |
6 |
CRi |
SD |
150 |
2 |
SD |
SD |
200 |
2 |
CR |
SD |
200 |
2 |
SD |
SD |
250 |
2 |
SD |
SD |
A new lead-in dose regimen, without steroids, is being used to allow for continued dose escalation as shown in Table 3.
Lead-in dose (mcg)* |
Target dose (mcg) |
Cycles |
Grade 1 |
Grade 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Not applicable |
15 |
30 |
3 |
1 |
15 |
100 |
21 |
4 |
0 |
15–100 |
150 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
15–100 |
200 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
15–100 |
250 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
15–30–100–150–200 |
250 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
*In patients who received 15mcg and then 100 mcg, they received 15mcg for 3 days followed by 100mcg for 3 days. In the last patient in the table, 15mcg, 30mcg, 100mcg, 150mcg and 200mcg were given for 1 day at a time. |
Prof. Roboz, and fellow authors on the study, concluded that AMV564 was well-tolerated up to doses of 250mcg, with no DLTs observed to date. There were only limited grade 1 and 2 CRS events, and a lead-in dose schedule is now being utilized to continue the escalation up to 450mcg. Some responses and stabilization of the disease for up to 7 months were observed.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox