The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View aml content recommended for you
On 12 January 2018, in a Correspondence to the Editor of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hiroyasu Ogawa from Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan, and colleagues, reported results of their retrospective study which, investigated the prognostic significance of Bone Marrow (BM) and Peripheral Blood (PB) blast percentage (%) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients who underwent Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT) with a non-Complete Response (CR) status including patients who experienced Primary Induction Failure (PIF), first relapse or second relapse.
Using the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program (TRUMP), the authors identified 3,098 AML patients who underwent allo-SCT in non-CR. Data on BM and PB blast % before allo-SCT was available for 929 non-CR AML patients and these were evaluated in this study.
The authors first investigated the impact of BM and PM blasts % on survival of patients and observed that both BM and PB blast % significantly correlated with poor overall survival (OS). Hence, to investigate the impact of these factors further on survival and relapse, patients were divided into three groups according to their Leukemic Burden (LB) based on the Hazard Ratio (HR) for survival including; low BM blasts % (BM blasts ≤ 20%) with absence of PB blasts (leukemic burden A), intermediate BM blasts % (20% < BM blasts ≤ 60%) with or without the presence of PB blasts (leukemic burden B), and high BM blasts % (60% < BM blasts) with or without the presence of PB blasts (leukemic burden C).
The authors noted that their study demonstrated that patients undergoing allo-SCT in non-CR can be classified into three groups using the leukemic burden levels which combines BM blasts% and the presence or absence of PB blasts %. Furthermore, pretransplant leukemic burden levels had a significant impact on relapse and survival rates in patients with AML undergoing allo-SCT in non-CR.
The authors concluded by highlighting that the findings of their study would be valuable information for clinicians transplanting AML patient in non-CR.
References
Your opinion matters
Approximately what proportion of your patients with FLT3-mutations also have NPM1 and DNMT3A co-mutations?