All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology, Roche, Syndax and Thermo Fisher, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
With increasing diversity of advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the need for prophylaxis against infection has also evolved. Triazoles currently serve as the cornerstone antifungal agent during remission reduction chemotherapy treatment of AML. However, there is always a possibility of the development of complications due to drug-drug interaction caused by CYP3A4 inhibition.
In 2019, a joint initiative was taken by European Hematology Association (EHA) Scientific Working Group (EHA SWG) Infections, EHA SWG AML, and Cochrane Hematology Group to propose a guideline on antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) for patients with AML treated with novel agents. An updated outline of this guideline was provided by Jannik Stemler in his presentation during the EHA2021 Virtual Congress.1
The following methods were used for the guideline preparation:
The use of existing guidelines was recommended when using antifungal prophylactic agents. Where the evidence is limited, consideration should be given to individual patient factors and the clinical setting to decide on the appropriate antifungal agents. The risk of potential toxicity and drug-drug interaction in the specific patient population and whether a strong inhibitor is present should also be considered. A list of selective AFP agents, along with the recommendations by EHA, is given in Table 1.
Table 1. Selective AFP agents and usage recommendations*
Agent |
Recommendation |
Comments |
---|---|---|
HMA |
W against |
Broadly available. |
Venetoclax + HMA |
C for |
Widely available. |
Gemtuzumab-ozogamicin |
Monotherapy: W against |
Mostly used as a combination drug during intensive chemotherapy. |
Glasdegib |
W against (especially triazoles) |
Used in palliative settings. |
Ivosidenib |
Monotherapy: W against |
Still under investigation in a clinical trial. |
Midostaurin |
Monotherapy: W against |
Frontline agent during intensive chemotherapy. |
Sorafenib |
Monotherapy: W against |
Used for intensive chemotherapy in elderly patients. |
Lestaurtinib |
C for |
Dose reduction from 80 to 40/60 mg is recommended if a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor is administered for AFP. |
Crenolanib |
W against |
If strong CYP3A4 inhibitors are used, weak recommendations are made. |
Gilteritinib |
Monotherapy: C for |
Monitoring of adverse events is advised if co-administrated with azole. |
Idasanutlin |
W for |
Avoid strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. |
Dasatinib |
S for |
NA |
AFP, antifungal prophylaxis; C, conditional; CYP3A4, cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A member 4; DDI, drug-drug interaction; HMA, hypomethylating agent; NA, not available; QTc, corrected QT interval†; S, strong; W, weak. |
EHA guidelines for the use of antifungal prophylactic agents suggest that selection of an agent should be based on finding the right balance between the risk of fungal infection, toxicity, and drug-drug interaction. For many of the antifungal agents listed, the evidence is scarce and only weak recommendations can be made. Nevertheless, this represents the first guidance on AFP management in the context of patients with AML receiving novel agents, which could assist healthcare professionals and oncologists in their treatment decisions.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox