All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Syndax, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kura Oncology, and AbbVie. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View AML content recommended for you
The AML Global Portal previously reported on a retrospective study by Portugal et al., (1) who described adverse events associated with high-dose daunorubicin, particularly gastrointestinal problems and invasive fungal disease (IFD). IFD is an infectious complication of AML patients who have intense chemotherapy and/or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) resulting in protracted and serious neutropenia.
IFD leads to increases in morbidity and mortality so AML patients may benefit from treatments to prevent IFD. The study indicated that there was no clear benefit of high-dose over low-dose daunorubicin, particularly in light of the increased incidence of adverse events. The AML Global Portal has also reported on the protective effect of antifungal prophylaxis (with posaconazole) in patients undergoing allo-HSCT. A recent study assessing treatment associated IFD has been published by Rodriguez-Veiga and Montesinos et al., in the Annals of Hematology, which retrospectively analyzed the incidence and clinical outcome of IFD in AML patients treated with chemotherapy, further details are below (2).
Main selected patient characteristics are detailed in Table 1 below
Table 1. Patient and disease characteristics
|
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; WBC, white blood cell; CR, complete remission; CRi, complete remission with incomplete blood counts; PR, partial remission |
|
|
Characteristic |
Overall |
|---|---|
|
Total |
285 (100) |
|
Age, years, mean (range) |
51 (17-65) |
|
Male gender |
158 (55) |
|
ECOG 0–1 (N=281) |
229 (82) |
|
Secondary AML |
51 (18) |
|
FAB subtype (N=279) M0 M1 M2 M4 M5 M6 M7 Other |
16 (6) 54 (19) 62 (22) 52 (19) 38 (14) 15 (5) 4 (1) 30 (10) |
|
WBC x 109/L, mean (range) |
10.5 (0.3–434) |
|
Hemoglobin g/dL, mean (range) |
8.9 (3.8–15.5) |
|
Extramedullary disease, (N=271) |
62 (23) |
|
Cytogenetics Core-binding factor Normal karyotype Intermediate Unfavorable No metaphases/unknown |
34 (12) 121 (43) 39 (14) 70 (25) 21 (7) |
|
Response to induction CR/CRi Resistance/PR Induction death |
185 (65) 71 (25) 29 (10) |
Table 2. Incidence of IFD and clinical outcomes according to the chemotherapy schedule

Table 3 Incidence of IFD and main clinical outcomes according to antifungal prophylaxisOutcomes of death during chemotherapy, hospitalization duration among survivors, and use of empirical or directed antifungal therapy were also more favorable in the HiDAC group
Table 3 details the crude incidence of IFD according to antifungal prophylaxis treatment

IFD is a frequent complication in patients with AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy and/or allo-HSCT. .Rodríguez-Veiga R. & Montesinos P. et al., showed that voriconazole prophylaxis was feasible and associated with a lower risk of IFD as compared with intravenous itraconazole or oral fluconazole schedules. The study results are in line with other reports on the incidence of IFD: Ananja-Rajah et al., (4) reported possible/probable/proven IFD rates of 13% with fluconazole prophylaxis, 20% with itraconazole, and 8% with voriconazole and posaconazole; overall crude incidence for this study was 10% possible/probable/proven IFD. In terms of probable/proven IFD incidence rates, other studies reported 8% with fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis (5), 3% with voriconazole (6) and 5.3% with itraconazole (7), and this study found a 5% overall incidence rate.
The authors also noted that this was possibly the first study to identify anthacycline-containing chemotherapy as a risk factor for the development for IFD.
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content