All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2024-05-02T13:44:43.000Z

Low dose azacitidine + venetoclax as maintenance therapy for patients with AML in remission

May 2, 2024
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Bookmark this article

Relapse with chemorefractory disease is common in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is a major cause of therapy failure and death.1 Maintenance approaches with low-toxicity regimens to delay or prevent relapse after consolidation is an emerging area.1 One promising combination is low-dose azacitidine (Aza) + venetoclax (Ven).

Recently, Bazinet et al.1 published results from a phase II trial (NCT04062266) evaluating the safety and efficacy of low-dose Aza + Ven as maintenance therapy in patients with AML remission after either intensive or low-intensity induction in The Lancet Haematology. We summarize the key results below.

Study design1

  • This was a single center, single arm phase II study with two patient cohorts based on previous induction intensity
    • Cohort 1: intensive induction
    • Cohort 2: low-intensity induction
  • Aza (50 mg/m2) was administered on Days 1–5.
  • Ven (400 mg) was administered on Days 1–14.
  • The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS).
  • Secondary endpoints were modified RFS, duration of remission, overall survival, event-free survival, measurable residual disease (MRD), and safety.

Key findings1

  • N = 35
    • Cohort 1: n = 25
    • Cohort 2: n = 10

Efficacy

  • The primary endpoint of median RFS was not reached in either patient cohort (Table 1).

Table 1. Survival endpoints for patients with AML remission after intensive or low-intensity induction and treated with low-dose Aza + Ven*

Survival endpoint

Cohort 1 (n = 25)

Cohort 2 (n = 10)

Median RFS, months

Not reached

30.3

              2-year RFS rate, %

71

52

Median modified RFS, months

Not reached

23.5

2-year modified RFS rate, %

64

34

Median DOR, months

Not reached

30.3

              2-year DOR rate, %

71

52

Median OS, months

Not reached

Not reached

              2-year OS rate, %

77

60

Median EFS, months

Not reached

23.5

              2-year EFS rate, %

59

34

Aza, azacitidine; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; DOR, duration of remission; EFS, event-free survival; OS, overall survival; RFS, relapse-free survival; Ven, venetoclax. 
*Adapted from Bazinet, et al.1
Modified RFS defined as time from enrolment into maintenance to relapse or death from any cause.

  • Of the 24% of patients who had positive MRD at enrolment; 25% of patients cleared MRD during treatment and a further 25% cleared MRD only after transitioning to transplant.

Safety

  • Overall, 69% of patients experienced ≥1 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE)
  • The most common Grade 3–4 TEAE were decreased platelet count (17%), lung infection (11%), decreased white blood cell count (11%), and decreased neutrophil count (9%).
  • Infectious TEAE were experienced by 29% of patients.
  • Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 3% of patients.
  • Deaths were reported in 26% of patients and occurred following AML relapse or from transplant related complications.

Key learnings 

  • Results from this trial highlight the feasibility and safety of low-dose Aza + Ven maintenance therapy in patients with AML in remission following intensive and low-intensity induction.
  • Larger, randomized studies are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of Aza + Ven as maintenance therapy.
  • An ongoing trial (NCT05010772) is evaluating a personalized maintenance approach using decitabine plus physician’s choice of a molecularly targeted second agent.

  1. Bazinet A, Kantarjian H, Bataller A, et al. Reduced dose azacitidine plus venetoclax as maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia following intensive or low-intensity induction: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haem. 2024;11(4):287-298. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00034-6

Related articles

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox